So you are saying that what you have is an agent which is sending one
thing, while its MIB says it will send another. That's not all that
uncommon.
If that's the case, then use xnmtrap to correct the OID to what is actually
sent.
James Shanks
Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
Larry Fagan
<larrytechie@yaho
o.com> To
Sent by: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
owner-nv-l@lists. cc
us.ibm.com
Subject
[nv-l] Traps not formatting right!
04/01/2005 01:10
PM
Please respond to
nv-l
Hi,
Back again.. I have sucessfully loaded Nokia System
trap definitions into netview using mib2trap command.
They are defined under 1.3.6.1.4.1.94.1.21.1.0. in
xnmtrap. Now when we receive traps from nokia device,
the TEC shows as below:
Trap found with no known format in trapd.conf(4)
Enterprise ENTERPRISES (1.3.6.1.4.1.94.1.21.1)
community test generic trap:6 specific trap:4
Timestamp:315688386 Agentaddr:testnokia.us.com
args(4): [1] hrPartitionEntry.hrPartitionIndex.3.1
(Integer): 1 [2]
hrPartitionEntry.hrPartitionLabel.3.1 (OctetString):
/dev/wd0f [3] hrPartitionEntry.hrPartitionSize.3.1
(Integer): 396952 [4]
host.hrDevice.hrFSTable.hrFSEntry.hrFSMountPoint.1
(OctetString): / "
Take a look at the OID in the event. It is without
last digit "0" from xnmtrap. Now my question is,why is
the diffence in OID? how do i decode this unformatted
trap. What am i supposed to understand from this
unformatted trap?
Many thanks as usual to all..
Larry
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|