To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface? |
From: | Mark Sklenarik <marksk@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2005 11:03:37 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:04:16 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <EFF2105927F5EE4EA64093699274875A02468460@fnbrbgmx01.fnb.co.za> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Run a "/usr/OV/bin/mapadmin -l", how many maps are listed? If more than one, have you made sure interface/node is unmanaged on all maps? Are you doing this on the X11 GUI or the Web Console? Mark F Sklenarik IBM SWG Tivoli Solutions Quality Assurance Business Impact Management and Event Correlation Software Quality Engineer
HI all V714 fp03 - solaris 2.8 I have the exactly the same thing I unmanage an interface and the next it alerts that it is down. I have even tried to allow only snmp and no pings to it and this still is not helping. Vynita -----Original Message----- From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:16 PM To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface? Jason, A device, once unmanaged, will stay unmanaged. That being said, there is one thing I can think of that will cause the device to become managed again. The most common is that the interface is a duplicate ip address of an interface on another device. You actually have it figured out, you just dont know why;-) What happens is when the other device is configuration polled, it removes the interface from the first device and adds it to this device. Then when the first device is configuration polled, it gets removed from the other device and added back to the first one, except now its managed. Any time a new interface is added to a device, it is managed(unless otherwise configured in the snmp configuration). So it looks like the interface simply remanages itself, but actually that is not the case, it is removed, readded and managed because it is newly discovered. SOOOO, now you what can you do.....well, you can find the other device and reconfigure it. You should actually be able to find in your trapd.log which other device the interface in configured on, you should see a interface deleted on the other device and then an interface added on the first one. It sounds complicated, but we see it alot. Now, if you know this interface is duplicated somewhere else for some reason in your environment, you can simply define the interface as HSRP in the seedfile(%) and then run "netmon -y". This will cause netmon to reread the seedfile and set the interface as an HSRP interface, then you can unmanage it safely and it should not return(at this point you can also hide it). Hope that helps, Paul Duppong, Jason wrote: >Hello List, >I think I know the answer to this already, but I wanted to bounce it off the >list anyways. Is it possible to have Netview permanently ignore an >interface or interfaces on a node? I know I can unmanage interfaces, but >the problem we have is interfaces that are already unmanaged somehow get >managed again when something happens to that node (I'm thinking a >configuration scan). I've been able to narrow the problem down to a handful >of nodes whose interfaces are on the same subnet even though the nodes are >completely unrelated. A couple other cases involve nodes with duplicate IP >addresses even though the nodes are unrelated. As much as I would like to, >I'm unable to "fix" these problems due to the nature of these nodes. A >search through the archives has not turned up anything that helpful, so I'm >hoping someone might have a better solution then what I'm currently doing or >planning. Currently I have a cron job that unmanages the interfaces in >question. I'm thinking about writing a script that would collect the MAC >addresses on the problem interfaces and use the list in our alerting >infrastructure to drop any alert from these interfaces, but since we don't >really care about these interfaces at all, the ideal solution would be to >configure Netview so it simply ignores everything about the interface. > >Thanks for any help in advance! > >Jason Duppong >Senior Systems Engineer >Thomson Legal and Regulatory Technical Services > > > ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ The views expressed in this email are, unless otherwise stated, those of the author and not those of the FirstRand Banking Group an Authorised Financial Service Provider or its management. The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on this, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Whilst all reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy and integrity of information and data transmitted electronically and to preserve the confidentiality thereof, no liability or responsibility whatsoever is accepted if information or data is, for whatever reason, corrupted or does not reach its intended destination. ________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface?, Pretorius, Vynita |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface?, Javier Morate Guerrero |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface?, Pretorius, Vynita |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface?, Javier Morate Guerrero |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web