To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface? |
From: | Javier Morate Guerrero <jmorate@carrefour.com> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:31:21 +0200 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:32:13 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OFF568EDD0.EB8F4A07-ON85256FDC.005286B3-85256FDC.0052BBFF@us.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
V714 fp02 AIX 5.1 1 map Hi, By the configuration that we have of high availability, we have two routers with some interface duplicated between them. If I unmanaged one, when netmon tested in the other, the interface was transferred and managed. I removed the leading comment character of the following lines of the netmon.conf file: # Set to TRUE to report duplicate IP addresses, don't remove them. NV_NETMON_REPORT_DUP_ADDRS_ONLY=TRUE # Set to TRUE to generate a duplicate event as in v5 NV_NETMON_GENERATE_DUP_ADDR_EVENT=TRUE The interfaces are not transferred and either they are not managed. Un saludo, Francisco Javier Morate Guerrero Dpto. Gestión de Sistemas Carrefour España jmorate@carrefour.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface?, Mark Sklenarik |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Cisco PIX Monitoring, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface?, Mark Sklenarik |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Permanently Ignore Interface?, Duppong, Jason |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web