To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Java processes running |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:08:39 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:07:51 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <1D99739B79BF7744BF8927B8F2274CA2063EB9@HQGTNEX5.doe.local> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Bill, It will take some experiments to determine whether what you see is normal or not. Basically the problem is that Linux treats java threads as separate processes and displays them in ps -ef, whereas other UNIX OS's do not. So if you are running the internal TEC adapter in nvserverd, for example, you'll see six or seven additional java processes all started by nvserverd. the trick is to trace things back through the PID and PPIDs. That's about all I can tell you, except that if any of your java processes get parented by init (1) and you start the NetView GUI with "netview", then the code will notice that and tell you that their are incorrectly parented (zombie) processes being left behind. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Java processes running, Evans, Bill |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Java processes running, Evans, Bill |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Java processes running, Evans, Bill |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Java processes running, Evans, Bill |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web