|Subject:||RE: [nv-l] Java processes running|
|From:||"Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans@hq.doe.gov>|
|Date:||Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:44:45 -0400|
|Delivery-date:||Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:46:24 +0100|
Thanks. That's about what I thought it might be. (I have to do a "ps -ef | grep -v java" to get the effect of "ps -ef" on a Solaris/AIX system.) Those older ones, as you indicate, may account for the nine zombies I have hanging around.
The result would be to sum the Java process time and call it nvserverd. That value makes sense to me.
Anyone who can comment on the amount of resource used by the Switch Analyzer processes vis a vis the NetView ones?
It will take some experiments to determine whether what you see is normal
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [nv-l] Java processes running, James Shanks|
|Next by Date:||RE: [nv-l] Status Polling myth, Oliver Bruchhaeuser|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [nv-l] Java processes running, James Shanks|
|Next by Thread:||RE: [nv-l] Java processes running, Leslie Clark|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web