nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Java processes running

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Java processes running
From: Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:52:43 -0400
Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:53:24 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <1D99739B79BF7744BF8927B8F2274CA2063EBB@HQGTNEX5.doe.local>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Yup. ITSA uses loads of resources. It does a full re-population of its own database daily (that's configurable) and at startup, in addition to reacting to the regular add/delete/manage/unmanage events, and it processes every single event that passes through the system.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
(248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager



"Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans@hq.doe.gov>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

06/27/2005 05:44 PM
Please respond to
nv-l

To
"'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc
Subject
RE: [nv-l] Java processes running





Thanks.  That's about what I thought it might be.  (I have to do a "ps -ef | grep -v java" to get the effect of "ps -ef" on a Solaris/AIX system.)  Those older ones, as you indicate, may account for the nine zombies I have hanging around.  

The result would be to sum the Java process time and call it nvserverd.  That value makes sense to me.  

Anyone who can comment on the amount of resource used by the Switch Analyzer processes vis a vis the NetView ones?  

Bill Evans
Tivoli NetView support for DOE

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [
mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 5:09 PM

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Subject: Re: [nv-l] Java processes running

Bill,

It will take some experiments to determine whether what you see is normal
or not.

Basically the problem is that Linux treats java threads as separate

processes and displays them in ps -ef, whereas other UNIX OS's do not.

So if you are running the internal TEC adapter in nvserverd, for example,

you'll see six or seven additional java processes all started by nvserverd.

the trick is to trace things back through the PID and PPIDs.  That's about

all I can tell you, except that if any of your java processes  get parented

by init (1) and you start the NetView GUI with "netview",  then the code

will notice that and tell you that their are incorrectly parented (zombie)

processes being left behind.

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows

Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web