[nv-l] SNMP v2c/v3 Support

To:	<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject:	[nv-l] SNMP v2c/v3 Support
From:	"Bigarani, Matthew \(Matt\)" <bigarani@avaya.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:22:58 -0700
Cc:	"Innes, Russell \(Russ\)" <rinnes@avaya.com>, "Mccarty, William \(Bill\)" <mccarty@avaya.com>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:23:35 +0100
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender:	owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index:	AcV8OFIntKpvf9KQTCuHMFzPymNICA==
Thread-topic:	SNMP v2c/v3 Support

Hi,
 
I'm trying to verify that NetView can receive SNMP traps sent by our
system. v1 traps always come up in the event viewer, but I've been
unable to get NetView to catch any v2c traps. I'm running NetView 7.1.4
on Windows XP Pro v2002 w/ SP1, and I have applied NetView FixPack 3.
 
I read through the list archives and saw it mentioned that 7.1.4 would
support v2 traps when FixPack 2 was applied
(http://lists.skills-1st.co.uk/mharc/html/nv-l/2004-08/msg00113.html),
am I wrong to assume that FixPack 3 includes the changes in FixPack 2?
Is anyone aware of other config steps that need to be taken to receive
v2c traps?

Does anyone have any experience with the SNMPv3 front-end mentioned in
this thread?
http://lists.skills-1st.co.uk/mharc/html/nv-l/2004-01/msg00340.html
http://www.snmp.com/products/snmpsecpack.html

Thanks in advance,
Matt Bigarani

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[nv-l] SNMP v2c/v3 Support, Bigarani, Matthew \(Matt\) <= Re: [nv-l] SNMP v2c/v3 Support, awatthey RE: [nv-l] SNMP v2c/v3 Support, Bigarani, Matthew \(Matt\) RE: [nv-l] SNMP v2c/v3 Support, James Shanks

Previous by Date:	Re: [nv-l] PC becomes Router !!, Paul
Next by Date:	[nv-l] snmpCollect, Tomasz Rozmus
Previous by Thread:	[nv-l] Java processes running, Evans, Bill
Next by Thread:	Re: [nv-l] SNMP v2c/v3 Support, awatthey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]