To: | <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] ? about specific trap numbers |
From: | "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn@pemcocorp.com> |
Date: | Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:51:22 -0700 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:51:27 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AcWcCPEV9x5tNQvmSIGkRAFaS+mIQAAJ+jWQ |
Thread-topic: | [nv-l] ? about specific trap numbers |
Brilliant! Obviously, I need to brush up on my math -
but I was able to follow your explanation and leverage it for my
issue.
This was exactly what I needed - thx very
much,
Glen Warn
PEMCO Corporation Computer Services
(PCCS)
206-628-5770
From: Philippe Menard [mailto:PME@fr.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 4:03 AM To: Glen Warn Subject: Fw: [nv-l] ? about specific trap numbers Glen, your problem is related to signed vs unsigned 32 bit integers. In other words : 2^32 = 4294967296 = 3221232503 + 1073734793. Microsoft rightly considers that specific = 3221232503 is a legal value, since the SNMP RFCs explain that specific is an unsigned integer. The NetView programmers made a small mistake by using signed integers. They made the same mistake when handling MIB variables, etc. I still have a few scripts which add 2^32 in case of negative values. About 2 years ago I opened a ticket about SNMP having no negative integers. Your findings prove that this bug has not been fixed in every case. Hope this helps, Philippe. ----- Forwarded by Philippe Menard/France/Contr/IBM on 08/08/2005 10:54 -----
NV 7.1.4 FP3 RH Linux AS 2.1 I am trying to modify some event configurations and have a puzzling problem. Microsoft gives me the decimal "specific trap" number I will see and I can convert that number to HEX (which I can see is referenced in the control desk) but the actual events I have to specify are neither. One example of my problem is this: SPECIFIC : -1073734793 (hex: c0001b77) Decimal: 3221232503 I do not understand how the c0001b77 is converted into -1073734793. The only way I've been able to figure these out so far has been to create an event that forces this trap. Some of the remaining ones (3221232481 specifically) I cannot force out and don't know how to calculate the Netview specific. Any ideas?? Glen Warn PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn@pemcocorp.com 206-628-5770 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] ? about specific trap numbers, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] traitor, Allison, Jason \(JALLISON\) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] ? about specific trap numbers, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] cisco_link_down and status polling, Alaa Farrag |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web