To: | NetView List <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] ITSA unset L2 Status |
From: | Mario Behring <mariobehring@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:22:10 -0700 (PDT) |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:22:56 +0100 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SNbDCzGcp9MadF+yOjAWscYWkOOvqp23DlJkgCbRM7IzuUwyeiSY4BXPbiy4KkjGHWM2uX2K8hWsFs2OkLfWbNba4jeYagyGZF1ninDnPkCh2NEgbQ4y84AWYo1/r1Vig7y9n2a/+td2L4NQ+WSuuDpxFXcmie/7RTQuWzwTAUY= ; |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Hi list, I´ve just installed ITSA 1.3 on my AIX with NV 7.1.4 FP03...I am new to this product... When issuing the "ovtopodump -X" command I get a YES for all switches in the "Layer 2 OID?" collumn, but I get "Unset" for almost all switches in the "L2 Status" collumn...what does it mean really ? Should that be different ? How ? Before installing I double checked the oid_to_type and oid_to_sym files and included all switches that were not there. Also, there are no unreacheable or undiscovered switches, and all of them were discovered as switches by NetView itself, before ITSA installation. Any help is appreciated. Thank you. Best regards, Mario Behring __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] cisco_link_down and status polling, Alaa Farrag |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Switch Analyser, Mario Behring |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Object Acknowledgement kills Netview, Brian Kraftchick |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] ITSA unset L2 Status, Jane Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web