To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Generating Topology Map with MLMs |
From: | usman.taokeer@s-iii.com |
Date: | Thu, 8 Sep 2005 14:46:53 +0500 |
Cc: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com, owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:44:57 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OFA3AAB9B9.5B7DE486-ON85257074.004C5C6B-85257074.004E0CAA@us.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
James i will cut this to short, what i want to achieve here is to have a single topology MAP having showing subnet of different customers. NOW i cant just give my NetView access to all these subnet( these are not just subnet but complete enterprise networks). Now here i will go with your recommendation that what should i do, use MLM or install NetView in each of customers network? I am not sure that NetView can share Topology map with other NetView servers? and if yes, then how? forwarding events is not a problem but i also want to have single console of Topology map of all networks that are being managed! Regards, Usman Taokeer Si3.
MLM is not a substitute for NetView but an adjunct to it. Whether it is suitable or not for the purpose you want, only you can decide. MLM only discovers devices in one subnet; it's own. That's why you would need one for each subnet of the customer's network if you want to use MLM discovery. it is possible to manually add a few devices in another subnet to an MLM for monitoring, but there is no way to get it to automatically monitor or discover more than its own subnet. It is not a tiny NetView. It's original design purpose was to monitor remote locations connected to the central NetView by slow WAN links which could not sustain the constant ping or SNMP traffic that Netview monitoring requires. MLM's communicate with NetView via SNMP sets and gets, and also traps. You have to have both the read and write community names correct in ovsnmp.conf. You can also configure the trapd destination table in the MLM to threshold on outside traps. Once netmon finds an MLM using an SNMP get with the read community string, it send an SNMPset to that MLM telling it to start reporting the discovery and monitoring data it has to the central location. The nodes the MLM has discovered will get added to NetView topology provided that netmon can ping them to verify their authenticity. Combining two distinct customer networks under one NetView will only work well if they have separate and distinct addressing schemes, since duplicates are not allowed, unless you also deploy CNAT gateways between them to do translations. You might profitably spend some time reading in the MLM doc before making your deployment decision. You might also deploy a test one and play with it a little too. That's easy enough to do. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] nv_libovw.jar???, Swapna Prasad |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] endpoint error, X X |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Generating Topology Map with MLMs, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Generating Topology Map with MLMs, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web