[Top] [All Lists]

[nv-l] ITSA port manage question

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: [nv-l] ITSA port manage question
From: "Kain, Becki \(B.\)" <bkain1@ford.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:44:17 -0500
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:47:40 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Hop-count: 1
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcXrliblNMPjHfYSQHid6OSsIqZgeg==
Thread-topic: ITSA port manage question
There was a post on July 7th about switch analyzer where the answer was:
Use this only if you want to optimize polling - it has no effect on what
ports are being managed. All ports are managed - those not covered by
the passive method will be actively polled - it simply removes the

Is this still the case in 1.3 - that if we enroll a switch, all ports
are managed?  We have a request to have only the uplinks of switch
monitored, not all the unnumbered ports.

Thanks in advance.

Becki Kain

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web