To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] TSM integration ??? |
From: | ray.smith@clorox.com |
Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:19:04 -0800 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:19:52 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Other options; you know about snmp. Two of the others are; On the CD for the latest version of TSM you find Operational Reporting software. There's an option in this product to create a TEC Log file. Or if you are running ITM you can do a wpostemsg directly from you TSM Servers to TEC server Ray Smith "Chi fa falla, e chi non fa sfarfalla"
We have been asked to manage events originating from my client's Tivoli Storage Manager systems. We have found reference to a couple of MIB's; which we can process via Netview, and forward on to TEC, as required. Anybody here care to comment on this process? What best practices do you recommend? Also, we find TSM documentation references to a TEC event adapter (receiver), including these BAROC files: ibmtsm.baroc itsmuniq.baroc itsmdpex.baroc Again, anybody here care to comment on this process? What best practices do you recommend? I have worked enough with TSM to know, and to respect, the voluminous stream of events that these processes can engender. I am especially interested in recommendations regarding managing events on the TSM side. Please, understand, I am NOT asking howto use the MIB's in NV; rather, I am looking for input regarding howto decide whether to use NV for this purpose; or to go directly to TEC via event adapter. Somebody with experience can say if these two processes duplicate each other; and whether or not there is value in using NV at all in this process. What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . -- This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information confidential to The Clorox Company and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete this message and notify the sender immediately.
signature.asc |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] [NV-L]: Status Polling Public Addresses on MSCS Clusters, Francois Le Hir |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Netview behind firewall & VLAN, X X |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] TSM integration ???, bill . kellam |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] [NV-L]: Status Polling Public Addresses on MSCS Clusters, Jon Austin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web