nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] NT and nonsnmp

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] NT and nonsnmp
From: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn@pemcocorp.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:23:14 -0700
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:25:32 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcZ4UyhI1WwO3sKIQoCJtIcZhdlZkwACdK8A
Thread-topic: [nv-l] NT and nonsnmp

Look at the security panel of SNMP configuration on one of the Windows systems  - is there a restriction on the “Allow SNMP packets from these hosts”?

 

 


From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Catalina Martinez
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 12:10 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: [nv-l] NT and nonsnmp

 

Hello List,

 

AIX 5.2 ML6 , Netview 7.1.4 FP4

 

I am trying to reduce the number of nonsnmp devices. I created a smartset and have placed all nonsnmp devices in it. I've contacted the owners of the devices have reduced the number; slightly-- from 74 to 52, we are getting there.

 

Several of these non-snmp devices are NT servers. The NT Admin have enabled snmp, we are using the same community string but Netview still can not do an snmpwalk or get, etc. Has anyone run into this? If so, how do I fix it.

 

These are old servers and we may be replacing them within the next 18 months. So, should I try fixing them or just let them be. I would rather fix them but not sure what the problem is. We are talking about 10 NT servers.

 

If we let them stay as nonsnmp, how can I get Netview just to do a presence monitoring and not any snmp status..We would just care to know if its up or down…

 

Thanks

 

Catalina M.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web