nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH ANALYZER packaged with NV

To: "'Tivoli NetView Discussions'" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH ANALYZER packaged with NV
From: REIBENSCHUH Alfred <alfred.reibenschuh@it-austria.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:47:04 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:48:24 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
List-help: <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help>
List-id: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-post: <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Sender: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com

hi!

it probably depends on how you use the TEC.

if you use the TEC for System-Management "for all its worth"
you should stick with it.

if you use the TEC for pure Event Correlation with a Network-Management
add-on, you might want to ask for a (cross-)upgrade to either
Omnibus+WebTop+IPM (L3) or Omnibus+WebTop+Precision (L2+3).

PS: we bought Riversoft (now Precision) in 2002 and where happy to
  receive Omnibus after the Micromuse buyout.

--
Alfred Reibenschuh
INFORMATIONS-TECHNOLOGIE AUSTRIA GMBH
Netzwerk-Management
A-1020 Wien, Lassallestrasse 5
T: ++43-1-21717-58947
F: ++43-1-21717-58979
E: alfred.reibenschuh@it-austria.com
W: http://www.it-austria.com <http://www.it-austria.com>

Diese Nachricht und allfällige angehängte Dokumente sind vertraulich und nur für den/die Adressaten bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der beabsichtigte Adressat sein, ist jede Offenlegung, Weiterleitung oder sonstige Verwendung dieser Information nicht gestattet. In diesem Fall bitten wir, den Absender zu verständigen und die Information zu vernichten. Für Übermittlungsfehler oder sonstige Irrtümer bei Übermittlung besteht keine Haftung.

This message and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any publication, transmission or other use of the information by a person or entity other than the intended addressee is prohibited. If you receive this in error please contact the sender and delete the material. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions as a result of the transmission.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Fitzwater [mailto:jfitz@princeton.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 6:12 PM
> To: Netview at IBM
> Subject: [NV-L] Why isn't SWITCH ANALYZER packaged with NV
>
>
> Is there a good reason why SWITCH ANALYZER is not part of the Netview
> package?
>
> It would seem that a level2 node mapping would be part of any product
> like this.
>
> I have been looking at adding the product, but is cost
> prohibitive due
> to pricing.
>
> Education price 8.00 per switch port and 4k per host processor.
>
> We have 15k switch ports =        120,000
> host has 2  900MHz Process =        8,000
> Maintenance per Yr                         5,000
> ------------------------------------------
> Total cost would be                    ~$133,000
>
>
>
> I could lower the cost a little by upgrading the host to a single 2k
> processor.  That makes sense!?
>
>
> I have talked with sales, but no break there.
>
>
> Any comments please.
>
>
> Jeff Fitzwater
> OIT Network Systems
> Princeton University

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web