To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [NV-L] 7.1.5 FP2 AIX Traps from Dialogic device formatted OK in trapd.log but being dropped in ruleset |
From: | "Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage)" <dvanorder@deloitte.com> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:38:43 -0500 |
Accept-language: | en-US |
Acceptlanguage: | en-US |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:43:21 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OFC8A680DB.0658145F-ONC1257513.002F082D-C1257513.002F331F@it.ibm.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: | <OF64B75CF4.3964D214-ON8525750D.004E0F7C-8525750D.004F951F@us.ibm.com><FD3A79FA7DA1DB41A73121E0FE66CB3207F0F9F30B@CBRMAIL10.actewagl.production.com.au> <OFC8A680DB.0658145F-ONC1257513.002F082D-C1257513.002F331F@it.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AclUWPrhxMyO/7iqR4uoeFUD7TqH8AAOAtSw |
Thread-topic: | [NV-L] 7.1.5 FP2 AIX Traps from Dialogic device formatted OK in trapd.log but being dropped in ruleset |
Hi folks, Wondering if someone has a suggestion for why a trap from the Dialogic
device itself that reads fine in trapd.log would not make it through nvserverd
processing, yet a test trap I send using the trapgen commandline tool will? At
first I wondered if the brackets were causing trouble, but testing proved that’s
not the case. Looking for ideas before I start turning on tracing/opening a
PMR. The ruleset is very simple, traps are filtered by Enterprise ID,
and forwarded to TEC. This entry in trapd is from the device and never makes it to
nvserverd.log: 1228138568
3 Mon Dec 01 07:36:08 2008
10.15.0.22
A Dialogic DMG Alarm
Trap: Alarm Index = 27, Alarm ID = 64, Severity = 2 (1 = most severe), Des cription
= Gateway Warning, Device = 0, Message = VoIP[10.27.8.58] In-Service This entry in trapd is from the trapgen tool, and makes it to nvserverd/TEC
with no problem 1228229728 3 Tue Dec 02 08:55:28 2008
10.30.15.120
A Dialogic DMG Alarm Trap: Alarm Index = Test, Alarm ID = Test1, Severity =
Test2 (1 = most severe), Description = Test3, Device = Test4, Message = Test[In Brackets]
message I wonder if the device is passing hidden params or characters
that trapd’s fine with, but cause the ruleset to drop it. Thanks!--Drew This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.
Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]
_______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [NV-L] Discovered Nodes over VPN, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [NV-L] 7.1.5 FP2 AIX Traps from Dialogic device formatted OK in trapd.log but being dropped in ruleset, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] Discovered Nodes over VPN, Giovanni Santa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [NV-L] 7.1.5 FP2 AIX Traps from Dialogic device formatted OK in trapd.log but being dropped in ruleset, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web