Re: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!

[Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>]

Are you on the right forum, Senny? I
thought UPS had migrated to ITNM. 

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
Detroit

"Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani@ust-global.com>
Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com

03/12/2009 09:11 AM

Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>

To	"Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
cc
Subject	[NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!

Hi Team,
 
I observed a peculiar problem
in SNMP tree. I just wanted to clarify the same with you experts.
 
In SNMP, if I have one object
label named say “XYZ” in a MIB and the same label is found in some other
MIBs, then latest loaded MIBs take the precedence. Meaning, same label
is not allowing in SNMP MIB, in other words, it is allowing but overwriting
the old one. Hope I am correct.
 
If that is the case, I have
major problem with the label called “products”, because almost all MIBs
has got this name in common. 
 
Currently I am in the exercise
of bringing UPS under monitoring, and the problem is there are lot of UPS
MIB labels found to be common and making my job more and more tough. I
know this is the problem with different vendors who develops this MIB but
any other way out to mitigate this issue?
 
Your help much appreciated!
 
Thanks
Senny
 
 _______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)