Sorry if I confused you!
Yes, in fact I am trying to bring the UPS Device under Netview
monitoring purview for its load and I come across with the peculiar issue as
stated below.
Revert me if you need any further clarity.
Thanks
Senny
From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
[mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Leslie Clark
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 8:30 PM
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
Subject: Re: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!
Are you on the
right forum, Senny? I thought UPS had migrated to ITNM.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
Detroit
"Senthil
Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani@ust-global.com>
Sent by:
nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
03/12/2009
09:11 AM
Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
|
|
To
|
"Tivoli
NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[NV-L]
SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!
|
|
Hi
Team,
I
observed a peculiar problem in SNMP tree. I just wanted to clarify the same
with you experts.
In
SNMP, if I have one object label named say “XYZ” in a MIB and the same label is
found in some other MIBs, then latest loaded MIBs take the precedence. Meaning,
same label is not allowing in SNMP MIB, in other words, it is allowing but
overwriting the old one. Hope I am correct.
If
that is the case, I have major problem with the label called “products”,
because almost all MIBs has got this name in common.
Currently
I am in the exercise of bringing UPS under monitoring, and the problem is there
are lot of UPS MIB labels found to be common and making my job more and more
tough. I know this is the problem with different vendors who develops this MIB
but any other way out to mitigate this issue?
Your
help much appreciated!
Thanks
Senny
_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)