RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!

[Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>]

Ha Ha. Got it. So which kind of UPS
devices are they? APC? Liebert?
The sharing of a particular mib label
is not usually a problem in Netview. The whole oid is usually involved,
so it is fully qualified. 
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprises.<vendor>.
 and then vendors are on their own. Where are you running into this
duplication?

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
(248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager

"Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani@ust-global.com>
Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com

03/12/2009 03:14 PM

Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>

To	"Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
cc
Subject	RE: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!

Sorry if I confused you!
 
Yes, in fact I am trying
to bring the UPS Device under Netview monitoring purview for its load and
I come across with the peculiar issue as stated below.
 
Revert me if you need any
further clarity.
 
Thanks
Senny
 
From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
[mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Leslie Clark
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 8:30 PM
To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
Subject: Re: [NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!
 

Are you on the right forum, Senny? I thought UPS had migrated to ITNM.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IT Services Specialist, Network Mgmt
Information Technology Services Americas
IBM Global Services
Detroit

"Senthil Kumar Mani" <Senthil.Mani@ust-global.com>
Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com

03/12/2009 09:11 AM

Please respond to
Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>

To	"Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
cc
Subject	[NV-L] SNMP MIB Labels creating issues!

 

Hi Team, 
  
I observed a peculiar problem in SNMP tree. I just wanted to clarify the
same with you experts. 
  
In SNMP, if I have one object label named say “XYZ” in a MIB and the
same label is found in some other MIBs, then latest loaded MIBs take the
precedence. Meaning, same label is not allowing in SNMP MIB, in other words,
it is allowing but overwriting the old one. Hope I am correct.
  
If that is the case, I have major problem with the label called “products”,
because almost all MIBs has got this name in common. 
  
Currently I am in the exercise of bringing UPS under monitoring, and the
problem is there are lot of UPS MIB labels found to be common and making
my job more and more tough. I know this is the problem with different vendors
who develops this MIB but any other way out to mitigate this issue?
  
Your help much appreciated!
  
Thanks 
Senny 
  
 _______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)