To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Perl vs shell scripts |
From: | Chris Cowan <chris.cowan@2ND-WAVE.COM> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 1999 11:19:28 -0800 |
Organization: | 2nd Wave |
Reply-to: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
Sender: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
"MENEZES, ALAIN" wrote: > > I'd like to know whether Perl programming is better than shell scripts > (speed ? efficiency ? easyness ?) > And where I could get the package. .. Freeware ? All of the above. As far as getting the packages, every pointer you'll ever need is at www.perl.com. I have a bunch of web sites like Activestate, Bull's (AIX freeware site), the Sun (smc.vnet.net) site, etc... I doesn't take much time to go grab this stuff. (And Tivoli ships with perl4 on all Managed Nodes!) Actually, it doesn't take much space either. Here are some of my reasons: Portability - even though they share a common ancestory, bash, ksh, and the bourne shell have lots of little syntactical differences. (I'm not going to even discuss csh, which should have gotten the knife long ago!) Within Tivoli, I find myself having to restrict myself to bourne syntax to make sure I'm always "safe." Actually the POSIX shell is ideal, but you have to know where to get the docs ;) There's also a big problem with dependencies on external utilities like awk, sed, etc. when used in conjunction with shell scripts. Since perl has all of this functionality integrated it makes for less headaches. The biggest problem you have with perl is worrying about Ver 4 vs 5. And, it's not that difficult. Speed - If you use perl properly, you should see significant differences in speed. The problem is that you want to write code that uses modules and makes systems calls directly, rather than just using the back ticks. Never fork a process unless you need to. For example, I constantly see people writing code that will do a `nslookup` rather than use gethostbyname(). Easyness - Perl has it hands down. After you've used perl in debug mode, I can't see how anyone would want to go back. (Of course, I'm amazed at the number of people that forget about this!) There of course a whole bunch of other reasons I prefer perl: - Encourages writing of more modular and reusable code - Actually has a concept of data types and structures (yes, I know some of the shells have arrays!) - Things like taint or suid protection, which you just don't find with the shells (unless you're crazy!) - Functionality, regexps, etc. I could go on, but should probably stop.
chris.cowan.vcf
smime.p7s |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | unmanaged objects repeatedly re-managed, OGrant |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: processes are incorrectly parented..., Oren Mamok |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Perl vs shell scripts, Art DeBuigny |
Next by Thread: | Re: Perl vs shell scripts, MENEZES, ALAIN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web