| To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Perl vs shell scripts |
| From: | Thomas Seidel <seidelt@DBF.DDB.DE> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 1999 09:36:38 +0001 |
| Comments: | Authenticated sender is <seidelt@poppix.dbf.ddb.de> |
| In-reply-to: | <4A043A1FE4B2D111AC3F00A0C96B5133015950F6@fmsmsx37.fm.intel.com> |
| Organization: | Die Deutsche Bibliothek |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
| Sender: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
We write a lot of script with perl, which is IMHO the best for processing structured data files. There is a GNU version of perl for NT available, which you can find on the NT server CD (or the ressource kit CD(?)). This port is nearly 100% compatible to the GNU UNIX version. Thomas -- Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Seidel ATM network & UNIX Die Deutsche Bibliothek E-Mail: seidelt@dbf.ddb.de Voice-Mail: +49-69-1525-1733 Fax-Mail: +49-69-1525-1799 Snail-Mail: Adickesallee 1, D-60322 Frankfurt/Main 43rd Law of Computing: Anything that can go wro @.#% fortune: segmentation fault, core dumped |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Perl vs shell scripts, MENEZES, ALAIN |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Nways Problems, Martin Conway |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Perl vs shell scripts, MENEZES, ALAIN |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Perl vs shell scripts, Chris Cowan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web