nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Device Status

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: Device Status
From: "Owens, Blaine C" <bowens@EASTMAN.COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 11:19:25 -0400
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Todd, the best way to handle is to unmanage the workstations - not only will
it eliminate the events but also save some system overhead as NetView does
not poll unmanaged devices. You can have them discovered as "unmanaged" by
modifying /usr/OV/conf/oid_to_type and restarting netmon. This change is for
"from now on" - you will have to manually unmanage already discovered
devices. Finally, if you don't even want to see the workstations on you maps
you may accomplish this through use of a seedfile. Again, this is for "from
now on" - you would need to manually delete already discovered devices or
rediscover your network. Let us know if any questions about all of this.

Blaine Owens
Eastman Chemical Company
Email - bowens@eastman.com
Phone - (423)229-3579
Fax     - (423)229-1188

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd E. Lewis [SMTP:telewis@PROVIDENTBANKMD.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 9:21 AM
> To:   NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
> Subject:      Device Status
>
> Whats the best way to check availability of devices on the network, but
> limit the status polling to specific smart sets, SNMP POLLING OPTIONS
> maybe ?
>
> For example I only want to check servers,routers,and hubs for up/down
> status. I don't care about workstations. What's the best way to handle
> this. Thanks in advance.
>
> Todd

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web