Jason Kravitz,
You mentioned that SEA 1.0.2 was more stable and compliant with NetView. I
have had a problem where our CPU hitting 100 % and staying there. This has
happened multiple times and I have narrowed it down to the DMI process.
When I look at the release notes for 1.0.3
http://www.sun.com/solstice/products/ent.agents/docs/releasehtml/release_not
es103.doc.html
<http://www.sun.com/solstice/products/ent.agents/docs/releasehtml/release_no
tes103.doc.html>
it states
Bugs fixed in this release
4112330:
Desc: DMI service provider spins out of control consuming
100% of idle CPU when servicing a longer service request
It seems that we don't have much of a alternative but to go to 1.0.3 to
solve this problem. My testing is on an Ultra 1 Solaris 3.6 system. For
production we are planning on an SUN E450.
Please advise.
I captured some information below on vmstat.
# vmstat 5
procs memory page disk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr s0 -- -- -- in sy cs us sy
id
0 0 0 31576 32392 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 7 326 98 1
1
0 0 0 583472 30088 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 134 5221 320 98 2
0
0 0 0 583472 30088 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 5303 328 100 0
0
0 0 0 583472 30088 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 5288 322 100 0
0
When I stop the dmispd process it clears up the CPU problem.
# ./init.dmi stop
# vmstat 5
procs memory page disk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr s0 -- -- -- in sy cs us sy
id
0 0 0 31608 32392 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 7 326 98 1
1
0 0 0 584528 30736 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 1383 322 0 0
100
0 0 0 584528 30736 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 1374 321 0 0
100
0 0 0 584528 30736 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 1381 323 0 0
100
I'd recommend using 1.0.2 - this seems to be the most stable and compliant
with
NetView
Regards,
Tom Giovannini
Enterprise Management Engineering - South
Address:
5400 Legacy Drive
M/S: A4-1C-38
Plano, TX 75024
Phone: (972) 604-4105 (8-834) Fax: -4776
Internet: tom.giovannini@eds.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Bresson, Connie
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 5:12 PM
To: Giovannini, Tom
Subject: FW: Solstice Enterprise Agents for NetView 5.1.1
Connie Bresson
Capabilities Development
connie.bresson@eds.com <mailto:connie.bresson@eds.com>
972-604-7083 (8-834)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Kravitz [mailto:Jason_Kravitz@TIVOLI.COM]
<mailto:[mailto:Jason_Kravitz@TIVOLI.COM]>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: Solstice Enterprise Agents for NetView 5.1.1
I'd recommend using 1.0.2 - this seems to be the most stable and compliant
with
NetView
"Bresson, Connie" <connie.bresson@EDS.COM <mailto:connie.bresson@EDS.COM> >
on 07/26/99 06:03:29 PM
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView
<NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU <mailto:NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> >
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU <mailto:NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
cc: (bcc: Jason Kravitz/Tivoli Systems)
Subject: Solstice Enterprise Agents for NetView 5.1.1
I am installing NetView 5.1.1 on a Solaris 2.6 system. Is there a
recommendation or a requirement to utilize a specific version of the
Solstice Enterprise Agents in this environment? Currently version 1.0.1 is
running on the system. I have seen that version 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 are
available per the SUN website.
Thanks for your assistance.
Connie Bresson
Capabilities Development
connie.bresson@eds.com <mailto:connie.bresson@eds.com>
972-604-7083 (8-834)
|