What I do is the following:
- If a critical node (I haven't got it working for interfaces, although it
seems there's some discrepancy between interfaces, segments and networks
that I have to investigate) goes down and no up trap is received after x
minutes, I put that node in a perl database.
- Each node in the perl database is pinged every 10 minutes to see if
they've come up, and an email is sent out with its status (usually it's down
because of the next step)
- If a node up trap is received, the node is checked against the database,
if it is in the database (ie. a critical node that had been down), then it
is removed from the db, and a confirmation email is sent...
Cheers
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie Clark <lclark@US.IBM.COM>
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Date: Friday, January 07, 2000 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: stupid question
>Steve and Patrick, can you expand on how you match up these events to make
>sure they refer to the same interface? The message has to be parsed,
>doesn't it?
>Or are you assuming that the next Interface Up trap about that router will
>be for the
>same interface?
>
>Cordially,
>
>Leslie A. Clark
>IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
>Detroit
>
>---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM on
>01/07/2000 11:28 AM ---------------------------
>
>Steve Francis <steve.francis@COMMSERV.UCSB.EDU>@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> on
>01/07/2000 10:38:28 AM
>
>Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
>
>Sent by: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
> <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
>
>
>To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
>cc:
>Subject: Re: stupid question
>
>
>
>Matt Ashfield wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been trying to get a ruleset to work lately, and have been having
>> problems with it. I basically want it to work like this.
>>
>> If something goes down and does not come back up within 2 minutes,
>perfrom
>> an action.
>>
>> I have this working for certain nodes, like the ip's of switches and what
>> not, but I want to get it to work for my router interfaces. So if I have
>> like 10 interfaces on a router, and only one of htem goes down, then
>it'll
>> recognize that an Interface went down.
>>
>> THe problem here is, I'm not sure which trap to look for.
>
>Interface down trap is indeed the one to use. I suspect that your problem
>lies in the mechanism you are using to decide if the router is one of the
>"certain nodes" that you care about. (i.e. if you are testing the IP
>address
>of the router interface that went down against the IP address of the node
>name
>that netview knows the router by, its not usually going to match.)
>Probably the easiest way to do this is to create a colection of MajorNodes,
>put all your routers, switches, etc, in it, and then use the ruleset object
>that tests whether the trap is from an object in that collection.
|