Thanks James, I will check with support.
Have a great day,
Luca
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Shanks [SMTP:James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 6:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Refresh Problem with Read-only ipmap
>
> Luca -
>
> I don't have any hints about improving performance on the NetView GUI in
> AIX.
> There is nothing you can tweak in NetView.
> We don't arbitrarily limit the speed of the map updates. But whether you
> can
> add mbufs or something like that, I don't know. If you like, you can open
> a
> problem to Support. Perhaps AIX can recommend some resource settings or
> you can
> ask NetView support if they will help you analyze performance (you need
> the
> Performance Tool box, server agent and client installed). Basically
> that's it.
> On my 43P 140 the r-o map and the r-w map update almost instantaneously.
>
> James Shanks
> Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
>
>
>
> "Smeriglio,Luca,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF." <Luca.Smeriglio@NESTLE.COM> on
> 02/14/2000
> 09:35:05 AM
>
> Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> NetView
> <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
>
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
> cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
> Subject: Re: Refresh Problem with Read-only ipmap
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply James.
>
> OK for #2.
>
> Regarding #1, do you know what could be checked to improve the speed ?
>
> Actually, the 'latency' is the same when I start the read-only GUI on the
> server, so this is definitely not an XWindows or slow-network problem.
>
> The read-only GUI itself reacts really quickly to every command, it's only
> related to the topology status updates being so slow.
>
> And the server is far from being overloaded, its performance is really
> good.
>
> Thanks again.
> have a great day,
> Luca
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Shanks [SMTP:James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM]
> > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 4:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: Refresh Problem with Read-only ipmap
> >
> >
> >
> > Luca -
> >
> > I cannot answer for your problem #1 with slow performance.
> > But #2 is not a problem. That is how it works. A read-only map does
> not
> > get
> > map changes of this sort without a refresh. This is what distinguishes
> a
> > read-only from a read-write map. This means that the owner of the
> > read-write
> > map has to plan his changes and coordinate them with the read-only map
> > users if
> > he wants them to get them after the maps are open.
> >
> > James Shanks
> > Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
> >
> >
> >
> > "Smeriglio,Luca,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF." <Luca.Smeriglio@NESTLE.COM> on
> > 02/11/2000
> > 05:20:31 AM
> >
> > Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> > NetView
> > <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
> >
> > To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
> > cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
> > Subject: Refresh Problem with Read-only ipmap
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear list,
> > I'm having some refresh/synchronisation problems between the main
> > read-write Map (running on the NV6k server) and read-only Maps opened
> > on other non-AIX boxes through XWindows (telnet on the server, then
> start
> > nv6k in read-only).
> >
> > 1/ when there's a status change, it takes sometimes more than 2 minutes
> > for
> > this change
> > to be reflected on the read-only maps, compared to the server.
> >
> > 2/ when there's a topology change done on the read-write map (for
> example,
> > managing/unmanaging nodes, deleting a node from all submaps, ...), this
> > change is
> > only taken into account by the read-only maps after a File/Refresh or a
> > reload of the GUI.
> >
> > I can't use Netview Client on those boxes unfortunately.
> >
> > Any idea how to improve those issues ?
> > Is this the normal behaviour of a read-only instance ?
> >
> > Thanks for your help !
> > Cheers,
> > Luca
> > Luca.Smeriglio@nestle.com
> >
> >
> > Luca Smeriglio
> > Nestec S.A. / Informatique du Centre
> > Network Architecture & Tivoli Coordination
> > Av. Nestl << File: ATT137571.txt >>
|