Thank you for your explanation.
Bernard Baudoux
* : 02/56(88).524.68
* : 1GA2H
e-mail : bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM [SMTP:lclark@US.IBM.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 October, 2000 13:48
> To: IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject: RE: [NV-L] Read-only map updates.
>
> Acknowledge, in V5, is separate. That is, each operator can do their own
> but
> the change is not shared except in the case of a refresh, when the r/o
> copy
> picks up the ack status of a r/w map. In V6.01, an enhancement was made to
> store ack status so that it is propogated to r/w maps. It is explained in
> the
> 6.01 release notes.
>
> Cordially,
>
> Leslie A. Clark
> IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> Detroit
>
>
> BAUDOUX BERNARD <bernard.baudoux@FORTISBANK.COM>@tkg.com on 10/24/2000
> 03:27:51 AM
>
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
>
>
> To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: [NV-L] Read-only map updates.
>
>
>
> Thank you Leslie, I understand what you mean, but if I acknowledge a node
> in
> the r/w map, how can this be propagated to the r/o ?
>
> Bernard Baudoux
> * : 02/56(88).524.68
> * : 1GA2H
> e-mail : bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM [SMTP:lclark@US.IBM.COM]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 24 October, 2000 06:16
> > To: IBM NetView Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [NV-L] Read-only map updates.
> >
> > The change in IP status is supposed to flow automatically to
> > the r/o map. If it is not, then you should contact support.
> >
> > The other behaviors you are describing are working as designed.
> > It has always worked that way, and works the same way in V6. The web
> > client is different. Since it is looking at a r/w map, you see what
> > happens
> > on the r/w map.
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > Leslie A. Clark
> > IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> > Detroit
> >
> > BAUDOUX BERNARD <bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com>@tkg.com on 10/23/2000
> > 10:05:45 AM
> >
> > Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> >
> > Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> >
> >
> > To: "'NETVIEW FORUM'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject: [NV-L] Read-only map updates.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have NetView 5.1.2 with AIX 4.2
> >
> > I have experienced some strange behaviour with the propagation of
> objects
> > status between the read-write map and read-only instances of it.
> >
> > When an object changes color (from green to yellow or red) this update
> is
> > sometimes propagated automatically to read-only maps, sometimes not.
> > When
> > they are not, we have to refresh the read-only maps (menu File item
> > Refresh).
> > It seems diffcult to specify when the propagation occurs and when it
> does
> > not. Maybe I have some guidelines, but I'm not sure of : when a node
> is
> > removed from the network (and deleted from the read-write map), it is
> not
> > updated in read-only. When an interface is unmanaged in read-write, it
> > is
> > not updated in read-only.
> >
> > Is there a way to refresh them automatically (the goal is to have help
> > desk
> > operator to he aware of any problem just by looking at those read-only
> > maps
> > at a glance ? We do not want them to get the read-write instance.
> >
> > Is it the same behaviour with NetView 6 ? (with the Web access to the
> map
> > ?)
> >
> >
> > Any help most welcome.
> > thanks in advance,
> > Bernard Baudoux
> > Phone: +32 (0)2/565.24.68
> > e-mail : bernard.baudoux@fortisbank.com
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
|