nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NetView status polling and DNS

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: NetView status polling and DNS
From: "Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM" <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 11:46:46 -0500
Hear, hear. But don't make the mistake one customer I know of made,
and put your main DNS on the same box as Netview. You do want to be
able to reboot you Netview system without scheduling an outage at
midnight to avoid inconveniencing users!

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit


James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM@tkg.com on 11/03/2000 11:19:12 AM

Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>

Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com


To:   IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
cc:
Subject:  Re: [NV-L] NetView status polling and DNS



Trapd relies heavily on name resolution -- there are two names to resolve
in every trap -- and the same kind of resolution happens down the line in
nvcorrd and actionsvr, if you are running rulesets which look a hostnames.

As has been said before, putting at least a caching DNS on the NetView box
or even in the same subnet is often the single greatest thing you can do to
improve performance.

James Shanks
Team Leader, Level 3 Support
 Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT

_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web