[Top] [All Lists]

RE: root cause analysis

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: root cause analysis
From: Stephen Elliott <selliott@epicrealm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:21:29 -0600

Seagate NerveCenter is a competing product to SMARTS. It works the
old-fashioned way, custom built filters and logic trees vs. SMARTS codebook.
Both approaches have limitations, but SMARTS may have an edge in
out-of-the-box installation and setup. Both can operate stand-alone (they
have there own status pollers) and pass events on to Fault Mgmt platforms.
SMARTS is much more expensive, though (at least it was a year ago).

There are a couple new products out there, but IMHO, they are all too
immature and limited in capability. 


Steve Elliott
Sr. Network Mgmt. Engineer
epicRealm, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gebhart, Tom (CC-MIS Tech Systems)
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 4:01 PM
To: 'nv-l@tkg.com'
Subject: [NV-L] root cause analysis

    Does anyone have a good recommendation (for or against) a solution to
cause analysis" in NetView?  I've read about SMARTS' InCharge and it sounds 
good.  Are there any other solutions to consider.  Thanks, Tom G.

    Tom Gebhart
        ConAgra Foods
Senior Network Administrator
        (402) 577-3677

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web