Here is the raw ruleset. It would be easier to load than to explain. I
worked with Jeennifer Nelson on this when we had her out, but we have since
realized that this isn't really reliable. Node up/down traps are still sent
even if it is within the 9 minute corr. window. I am totally confused!
Scott
RuleSet13 RuleSet NVQryColl14
"" 0
NVQryColl14 NVQryColl TrapID15 TrapID18
2 us381d09 1 ""
TrapID15 TrapID AttrDelay16
netView6000 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3 "6 " "58916865 " 0 "netView6000
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3" "IBM_NVNDWN_EV Specific 58916865
" "" 0
AttrDelay16 AttrDelay Action17
"" 0 "" 540 "" 0 0 0 "2 2 0~"
Action17 Action
"/usr/OV/alert/bdcdown.sh $NVATTR_1 $NVATTR_2 $NVATTR_3 $NVATTR_4 $MSG" ""
TrapID18 TrapID AttrDelay16.2
netView6000 1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3 "6 " "58916864 " 0 "netView6000
1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3" "IBM_NVNUP_EV Specific 58916864
" "" 0
>From: "James Shanks" <SHANKS@us.tivoli.com>
>Reply-To: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>To: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>Subject: Re: [NV-L] Ruleset correlation issues
>Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:58:04 -0400
>
>What does your ruleset look like?
>
>
>James Shanks
>Level 3 Support
>Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
>
>
>
>"Scott ." <pepsiasg@hotmail.com>@tkg.com on 08/16/2001 12:57:33 PM
>
>Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
>Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
>
>
>To: nv-l@tkg.com
>cc:
>Subject: [NV-L] Ruleset correlation issues
>
>
>
>AIX 4.3 NetView 6.0.2
>
>I have a smartset that contains nodes with the attributes isNotes=TRUE and
>IP Status=Critical. I want to create a ruleset that says, if the node is in
>this smartset, watch it for 9 minutes. If the node leaves the smartset
>before the 9 minutes expires, do nothing. This will allow for reboots so
>NetView will not pass alerts. If it is still in the smartset after 9
>minutes, run a script using the "action" block from the ruleset editor
>template. I have attempted to do this with various methods and I can't seem
>to get it all working. I am loading the rule via the ESE.automation file. I
>have made sure that I did not overstep the restrictions for staring a rule
>set this way. I am at my ropes end on this one. Anyone out there doing
>something similar? If you are, could you email me the rule so I can
>evaluate
>it? Thanks in advance!
>
>Scott
>
>scott.bursik@fritolay.com
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________
|