nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] AIX vs. Solaris

To: <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] AIX vs. Solaris
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 08:58:51 -0500
I have exactly the opposite opinion.

The SNMP agent is not as bad as it used to be (Solaris v2.8). I do agree on the 
number of cores, but to be honest, thats an application programmer problem. 
Code needs to be written that doesn't core. If there is a predominance for 
cores under Solaris, then maybe that implies a code-writing-bias towards AIX 
(not being judgemental, these things are part of code evolution, and AIX came 
first).

I am responsible for the paging queue enhancement under Solaris - my APAR (yay!)

In my estimation, go with what your shop knows best. If you are a windows shop, 
I would use Linux. If you are an AIX shop, I would use AIX. If you are a 
solaris shop, I would use Solaris. In my mind, since you run the fine line 
between sysadmin and network engineer its best to be able to leverage local 
talent and so matching your operation to whats out there seems like a good 
idea. I have used both AIX and Solaris, if there is a upside to one over the 
other, I don't know what it would be. 

-----Original Message-----
From: jshanks@us.ibm.com [mailto:jshanks@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:17 AM
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] AIX vs. Solaris


I don't know how anyone else feels, but in my view, the SEA SNMP agent on 
Solaris is such an unreliable  pain, and Solaris itself is such a pain to 
administer, that if you have a choice, I would go with AIX.  SMIT alone is 
worth the price of admission, plus your SNMP operations will be more 
reliable, and finally, you will probably have fewer cores.  Solaris is 
notoriously more picky about null pointers and empty strings.  I cannot 
tell you how many Solaris-only cores we've fixed as a result. 

The only daemon difference I am aware of in NetView is nvpagerd.  The 
pager queue is in shared memory and Solaris doesn't allow us to expand it 
the way AIX does, so the pager has a fixed queue size on Solaris.  Not a 
problem usually, but possibly so if you send a lot of pages.  So the size 
was made configurable with IY29166.  Other than that, I am not aware of 
any other underlying differences. 

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
 





"Wilkinson, Iain D" <iain.wilkinson@eds.com>
07/02/2002 03:09 AM

 
        To:     "'nv-l@lists.tivoli.com'" <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
        cc: 
        Subject:        [nv-l] AIX vs. Solaris

 

Folks,

In the big, wide, real world is there any difference between the of 
NetView
7.1.2 on AIX to it running on Solaris?

Regards,

Iain Wilkinson
Systems Management Group
Electronic Data Systems


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web