|Subject:||RE: [nv-l] Query regarding MIB Data Collector of NetView 7.1.3|
|From:||"Dejan Mijailovic" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:03:19 -0500|
|Delivered-to:||mailing list email@example.com|
|Delivery-date:||Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:56:17 +0000|
|Mailing-list:||contact firstname.lastname@example.org; run by ezmlm|
I agree here,
I think IBM should really concentrate in adding THE REAL and FULL support for SNMP V2 and SNMP V3, rather than adding so much Java stuff and not reviewing the foundation code for NetView. This is what the customer wants. First question they ask is "Does it support V2 and V3?". It looks like all IBM C programmers, working on NetView source code have quit :-). Building that Java interface is nice and adding some scripts are fine too, but I think, by far the most important thing would be to add the FULL and COMPLETE support for SNMP v2 and v3. This is what sells the product.
Anyone agree with me?
Inquent Technologies Inc.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [nv-l] Router Fault Isolation, Stephen Hochstetler|
|Next by Date:||[nv-l] Forwarding Events To Tec, reamd|
|Previous by Thread:||RE: [nv-l] Query regarding MIB Data Collector of NetView 7.1.3, Manish Purwar|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [nv-l] Query regarding MIB Data Collector of NetView 7.1.3, Todd H.|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web