| To: | lclark@us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [nv-l] udp_recvspace vs tcp_recvspace |
| From: | Ken.Garst@kp.org |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:07:35 -0400 |
| Cc: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:02:32 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm |
|
On an AIX server reducing the udp_recvspace means any udp datagram, including Netview traps, can be dropped. You can determine whether the udp space should be increased by running the command "netstat -p udp" and look for the number of datagrams dropped. (Also, look at netstat -p tcp and netstat -p ip and netstat -d). Read up on the man page for netstat. Regards, ken |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Java Stand alone client and Bitmaps, James Shanks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Traps as IP's Rather Than Names, Leslie Clark |
| Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] udp_recvspace vs tcp_recvspace, Leslie Clark |
| Next by Thread: | [nv-l] netview - dumping out the topology, dmahler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web