nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] Wrong version

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Wrong version
From: James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:52:48 -0400
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:02:02 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com

The content of the variable will be decoded.  But the MIB OID itself will not be unless you load an SNMP  V1 version of the MIB with xnmloadmib.  The xnmloadmib2 database is not used by trapd at this time.  That might change in the future but not now.  And the entire issue may be moot as xnmloadmib2 has been deprecated.  That's mentioned in the Release Notes.

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group



bill.kellam@worldspan.com
Sent by: owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com

10/20/2003 02:45 PM
Please respond to nv-l

       
        To:        nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
        cc:        
        Subject:        Re: [nv-l] Wrong version







That's disappointing. In the meantime, I've worked on the traps that I'm
receiving from this device. I ran mib2trap, on CISCO-LOCAL-DIRECTOR-MIB.my,
and got a set of addtraps. I executed the script to load the definitions.
The mib itself is SNMPv2, so I use xnmload2. I've successfully modified the
trap definition with some English verbiage, but the variable that is sent
with the trap isn't decoded. I can use xnmbrowser2 to find and browse to
it, but it is still in dotted-decimal form in the log file. Is that normal?
Am I seeing a v2 variable in a v1 trap?

Regards,
Bill Kellam
Enterprise Integration and Management



                                                                                                                                           
                     Leslie Clark                                                                                                          
                     <lclark@us.ibm.com>            To:       nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com                                                        
                     Sent by:                       cc:                                                                                    
                     owner-nv-l-digest@lists        Subject:  Re: [nv-l] Wrong version                                                      
                     .us.ibm.com                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                           
                     10/18/2003 04:43 PM                                                                                                    
                     Please respond to nv-l                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                           





The cisco Local Director device has a very badly behaved SNMP agent, if you
ask me. Notice the oid they claim to be using. They answer to very little.
I generally treat them as non-snmp and figure it is sort of like firewalls
- they don't want us to know too much about them. Has anyone else had
better experience with them?

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit

                                                                         
   bill.kellam@worldspan.com                                              
   Sent by:                               To:        NetView mailing list
   owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>                
   .com                                   cc:                            
                                          Subject:        [nv-l] Wrong    
                                  version                                
   10/17/2003 10:44 AM                                                    
   Please respond to nv-l                                                
                                                                         









Hi,

When I snmpwalk a particular device, I get responses like this:

>snmpwalk 10.6.1.253 system
Wrong version: 1
Continuing anyway
system.sysDescr.0 : DISPLAY STRING- (ascii):  Cisco LocalDirector

Is this Netview telling me I'm using the wrong version or the
LocalDirector?

7.1.3/AIX5.2


Regards,
Bill Kellam
Enterprise Integration and Management






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web