nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] snmpcollect problems

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] snmpcollect problems
From: CMazon@commercebankfl.com
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:43:12 -0500
Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:53:37 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <187CAB09B2E5D840AA29EBF23678DD3B03459B@mail_data.APTRONICS.CO.ZA>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com

Its funny you wrote this... I am not sure about #1 but I just spoke to a Tivoli support  (5 mins ago) about #2 and he told me that the grapher will only display data that has no breaks in the data collection and that this is by design. I have the same environment as your customer.  I am looking for an alternative to graph data for myself.  If anyone out there as an alternative please post.

Thanks.

Carlos



"Pritesh Jewan" <Pritesh@aptronics.co.za>
Sent by: owner-nv-l-digest@lists.us.ibm.com

10/30/2003 03:17 AM
Please respond to nv-l

       
        To:        <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
        cc:        
        Subject:        [nv-l] snmpcollect problems



Hi List,

 

I have a customer who is managing about 50 Cisco routers. The one router is a Cisco 3600 series router and the rest of the routers are all small routers with +-4 interfaces. They are running Netview V7.1.3+FP1 on Windows 2000 Server. The server is a 2 way processor machine with 2 GIGs of RAM. I have set the box up to collect bandwidth utilization(BandwidthUtilHdx) on all routers serial interfaces and avgBusy on all routers.

 

There are two problems that I am having:

 

1)       I turned on tracing and I keep getting a large number of interfaces been deferred( Deferring snmp collection of BandwidthUtilHdx.1.17 on switch1) messages in the snmpcollect trace file. I opened a pmr and was asked to email support the trace file. They came back saying that if netview does not get a response from the device the collections would be deferred. However, the customer also has a test Netview box installed on Linux redhat 7.2 and is not seeing the same problem. Support said that the next step would be to sniff the network and see what was happening in the network. Has anyone else had this problem on Netview NT and managed to find a solution to prevent a high number of deferrals? SNMPCollect has been setup to write to flat files and sql. Collection intervals are set to 10mins and I have set the defer collections on down nodes to 10 min.

2)       When the customer does try to view data for a specific router through the graph data option in Netview the grapher only displays data from whenever it was last successfully collected. So if a deferral happened at 10:00am and all collections after that point are successful then the grapher would only display data from 10:00 am onwards. Even if the data before 10:00am was successfully collected it would not be displayed. Is this working as designed or am I missing something that can be configured?

 

Thank you

Pritesh

 

Pritesh Jewan
Aptronics (Pty) Ltd
Tel   : +27 (0) 11 577 0800
Fax  : +27 (0) 11 326 4921
Cell : +27 (0) 84-677-2486

pritesh@aptronics.co.za

*** Aptronics…Has Moved !

Please take note of new address and contact details.

 

Physical Address :          

Aptronics House, 288 Main avenue                  

Cnr. Main and Harley        

Ferndale, 2194

 

Postal Address:

P.O. Box 2732, Randburg, 2125

 

Telephone : (011) 577-0800

Facsimile : (011) 326-4921

 

 

Legal Disclaimer: This E-mail, it's attachment/s and the information that it contains is/are confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access to this E-mail, it's attachment/s, and the information it contains is/are for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this Email , do not read, disclose, disseminate or use the information in any way.

 

Any views in this communication are those of the sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Aptronics (PTY) Ltd. Aptronics (PTY) Ltd and the sender does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free of errors or virus nor does it guarantee that it has not been intercepted or interfered with en-route.

 

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web