nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView
From: Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:13:46 -0500
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:22:26 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

In that case, reducing the number of routing table entries pulled from the default of 800 to, say, 2, after initial discovery is done will help prevent swamping them during demandpolls and regular configuration polling. That is done in Options... SNMP.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit



"Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

01/12/2004 10:44 AM
Please respond to nv-l

       
        To:        <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
        cc:        
        Subject:        RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView



The issue is the CPU performance in the 2500. There are some suggestions floating around in the archives about trimming down the amount of SNMP data that NetView asks for. Remember that SNMP is the lowest priority function in the Cisco IOS. Retries/timeouts will help but trimming down the SNMP queries is probably necessary.
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On Behalf Of CMazon@commercebankfl.com
Sent:
Monday, January 12, 2004 9:31 AM
To:
nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject:
RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView


We have several 2500 series routers and I also resolved the issue by increasing the retry and the retry intervals.


Carlos Mazon


"Seminara, Sandro" <SSeminara@fnis.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

01/12/2004 01:32 AM
Please respond to nv-l

       
       To:        "'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>

       cc:        

       Subject:        RE: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView




I experienced the same problem about 2 years ago before we replaced our 2500 series routers.  We had approx. 700 2500 series routers of various flavors deployed though out our WAN.  Many of these devices were running out of memory during demand polls etc.  In order combat our polling issues, the only thing we could do was increase the retry and lower the timeout values.

Thank you
Sandro Seminara

Fidelity National Financial

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan E. Hennis [
mailto:Hennis_Alan_E@cat.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:03 PM

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Subject: [nv-l] Cisco 2500 routers and NetView

NV 7.1.3 FP 1 RH Linux 7.2

I have a lot of old Cisco 25xx routers in my network. There are plans to
replace these older devices this year but not until much later in the year.

I poll all of my routers via SNMP.  I see a lot of missed SNMP queries of

these routers. This causes NetView to report the router down when it is in

fact still reachable.  I was wondering if anyone on the list has

experienced this of has any suggestions on how to better monitor older

Cisco routers.

Thanks
Alan E. Hennis

Caterpillar Inc

Systems+Process Division

309.494.3308

hennis_alan_e@cat.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web