|
No
doubt I overlooked something between the KB and manuals--where can I find
this script? I did a find for TEC_* and tec_* no file resembling that name.
If you can also point me to where this is documented, I would be grateful.
Thanks James--Drew
Drew -
I'm stumped about what is confusing to
you.
There is no configuration for you
to do, other than run the tec_its_upgrade script and create a new tecint.conf
(which happens nicely if you rename your old one and create a new one from
serversetup).
The script changes
the configuration of the NetView events in trapd.conf so that they work with
the new TEC rules. It makes TEC_ITS_BASE the new default event class
instead of the old Nvserverd_Event class. And it removes severity
as passed field, because severity will be set dynamically by the new TEC
rules, and they cannot do that correctly if you are sending your choice of
severity instead. The NetView ruleset is the same one we shipped in
NetView 7.1.3 : TEC_ITS.rs. Bring it up in the NetView ruleset
editor and you'll see that it just picks out specific NetView events and sends
them to TEC. If you want additional events, from Cisco or something,
you'll have to add those, but those lie outside of the new integration.
That's all there is to the NetView
side.
James Shanks
Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX
and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
|
| "Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\)"
<dvanorder@deloitte.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
01/15/2004 11:24 AM
Please respond to nv-l
|
To:
<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Has anyone
implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and
TEC 3.9
|
I started on it last night, and it does have some very
useful information. Unfortunately the NV side is where I am struggling the
most; namely the trap configurations and NV forwarding ruleset. Until that is
understood and confirmed configured correctly to match what TEC expects it's
tough to tell how well the TEC rule is working. I just opened a sev 3 PMR;
also offered to help write any documentation that could be considered a guide.
Like most IT folks, I don't have the luxury of focusing on one project at a
time, and really need to slam and jam when solutions are deemed shrink
wrap.
Thanks for looking into this!
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf
Of Christopher Haynes
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 9:57
AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Has
anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and
TEC 3.9
Drew,
I don't know if you have looked at it yet but you might
want to check out the TEC 3.9 Rule Set Reference
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/tec/SC32-1282-00/en_US/PDF/ecosmst.pdf
It
goes into detail about what all the rulesets do (including
netview.rls)
thanks,
Chris
Haynes
haynesch@us.ibm.com
Tivoli Quality Assurance Manager
(919)
224-1217
|
| "Van Order, Drew \(US -
Hermitage\)" <dvanorder@deloitte.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
01/14/2004 08:09 PM
Please respond to nv-l
|
To:
<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc:
Subject:
[nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC
integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC
3.9 |
If there is a single
document, can someone point me to it? I've found pieces and parts in the
different manuals, but it's not working out of box (as advertised by our sales
team):
- Netview.baroc and netview.rls in
rulebase
- Netview6000 traps in NV ruleset TEC adapter
uses
- Netview6000 traps have TEC_ITS event classes
mapped in xnmtrap
Events reach TEC, but severities do not make
sense, and I'm sure this means any change rules in the ruleset will not
execute. For example, TEC_ITS_INTERFACE_STATUS is HARMLESS at TEC, yet
message is interface xxx is down. However, I have a SEGMENT_STATUS and
NETWORK_STATUS event as WARNING in TEC, but the message indicates they are
up. The netview6000 traps are set from previous versions where TEC classes
were OV_. I directly edited TEC classes for each trap in xnmtrap, but I
think this issue pertains to TEC slots that are not being passed in the trap
or matching what the TEC rule expects.
We are trying to replace TFNC, which has been
worth every penny. Do I need to feed the netview6000 MIB through mib2trap
again--and will this populate xnmtrap properly? What's the name of the
mibfile that contains the netview6000 OID?
Sorry for all the questions--since this
integration crosses NV and TEC boundaries, I'm not sure if a PMR will get me
anywhere. I think I'm getting close, but there has to be an easier
way.
Thanks--Drew
Drew Van Order
ESM
Architect
(615) 882-7836 Office
(888) 530-1012 Pager
This message (including any
attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific
individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended
recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or
distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
strictly prohibited.
This message (including any
attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific
individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended
recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or
distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
strictly prohibited.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
|