RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map

nv-l

RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map

To:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject:	RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map
From:	DSullinger@dot.state.az.us
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:19:42 -0700
Delivery-date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:51:15 +0000
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender:	owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

We deleted an ATM router from our all submaps and waited for it to rediscover the device an place it in the holding area. We waited a good hour and it still didn't show up. I did a nmdemandpoll on both the hub router connected to the ATM circuit and the ATM router itself. Demand poll did poll the device, but it still never showed up on the map. Do I need to do a ovtopofix -u to get it to show up?

Thanks

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger <= RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, James Shanks RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Ray Westphal RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Binder, Karin

Previous by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC 3.9, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\)
Next by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC 3.9, Christopher Haynes
Previous by Thread:	[nv-l] 2 Separate Questions: servmon and Unmanage, Catalina Martinez
Next by Thread:	RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, Erdey, Raymond M
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd