To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery |
From: | "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:09:54 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:16:55 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
OK itneresting conundrum for everyone. What would it take and is it possible to do the following? I have a switch I wish to load from a seedfile into netview. This devices has multiple interfaces on it. I load the device using the uplink interface's IP address. Once it is loaded via that IP address it will be demand pulled to pull all other relevant information from the device. Such as other interfaces, sysname, etc. NOW -> I want the uplink to be managed but all other interfaces on the device I want to be unmanaged when it is discovered. Can this be done automatically? Or perhaps through a script written that will go in and unmaange the ports(interfaces) I do not care about on the device. Can you unmanage a range of ports given specific information from the CLI? Thanks for your brain work Chris Petrina |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Has anyone implemented the full TEC integration (correlation rules) NV 7.1.4 and TEC 3.9, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Recall: help, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Object in DB but not on map, DSullinger |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] discovery and limiting discovery, Jane Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web