To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] incorrect symbol type |
From: | Paul <pstroud@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:09:26 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:16:27 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OF7249F821.AD05E482-ON85256E5A.00574DE9-85256E5A.00579C5E@mead.com> |
References: | <OF7249F821.AD05E482-ON85256E5A.00574DE9-85256E5A.00579C5E@mead.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 |
Chris, What do you mean by proper symbol? Do you mean the generic router symbol, or some Cisco symbol? Paul Christopher J Petrina wrote: Q1: I have 10 Cisco Routers all almost identical to one another I have them placed in the seed file these are new devices, when I start netmon with the seedfile (-s) it finds all the Cisco devices, HOWEVER it only marks about half of them with the proper symbol. Even though when I look at them in the objects database they all show the same attributes as far as connector =TRUE Router = TRUE ,etc. is there a reason it is only placing the symbol and about half of them? Or is this more of a PMR thing. One little note (which I hate to put here) is that these are EVPN routers. They have an ACL that allows me to get to the loopback address of them, I have the Read Only Community string. I can read all the information I want about them through the mib browser.Chris Petrina |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Switch analyzer and Oracle DB, Stephen Hochstetler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] incorrect symbol type, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] incorrect symbol type, Christopher J Petrina |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] incorrect symbol type, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web