RE: [nv-l] Location.conf

To:	<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject:	RE: [nv-l] Location.conf
From:	"Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:05:51 -0600
Delivery-date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:16:07 +0000
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender:	owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index:	AcQRKk+wTlBu48+vRaeVjZHkrsI3tgAfq7JA
Thread-topic:	[nv-l] Location.conf

If the containers contain ALL of the subnets in the router I believe the router will automatically drop into the container. The trick is to make sure that every single subnet the router contains lands in the same location/container.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On Behalf Of Christopher J Petrina
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:55 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: [nv-l] Location.conf

What would happen if I only placed subnets in the proper location containers? I did not add any gateway entries into the seedfile. Would netview place the routers to the closest point of the subnet?

Chris Petrina

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[nv-l] location.conf, Milton . W . Bridges Re: [nv-l] location.conf, Leslie Clark [nv-l] Location.conf, Christopher J Petrina Re: [nv-l] Location.conf, Hendrik Zahn RE: [nv-l] Location.conf, Barr, Scott <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [nv-l] Location.conf, Hendrik Zahn
Next by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Unreachable Nodes.., reamd
Previous by Thread:	Re: [nv-l] Location.conf, Hendrik Zahn
Next by Thread:	[nv-l] NetView User Group Announcements, Barr, Scott
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]