| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [nv-l] |
| From: | Paul <pstroud@bellsouth.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 May 2004 11:59:16 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 20 May 2004 17:10:09 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| In-reply-to: | <85001EF006E3844E9C519A4FF0B6760303BF8BA7@exchange1.odfl.com> |
| References: | <85001EF006E3844E9C519A4FF0B6760303BF8BA7@exchange1.odfl.com> |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 |
Normally a unnumbered interface is shown in NetView as an interface with an address of 0.0.0.0. Do you have a number of unnumbered interfaces on these guys? Paul Brian Kraftchick wrote: NV 7.1.3 on Win2KCould anybody tell me where the 0.0.0.0 interfaces come from in router objects? I have two core routers that have only ever had 1 or 2 0.0.0.0 interfaces discovered....now they both have about 50.....what could this be coming from ? ** *Brian Kraftchick*Network Administrator *Old Dominion Freight Line* Ph: (336) 822-5938 Fax: (336) 822-5149 E-mail: brian.kraftchick@odfl.com <mailto:brian.kraftchick@odfl.com> Web Site: www.odfl.com <http://www.odfl.com/> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [nv-l], Brian Kraftchick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [nv-l] Space used in /var, reamd |
| Previous by Thread: | [nv-l], Brian Kraftchick |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l], Hampel, Paul E |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web