nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l]

To: "'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l]
From: Brian Kraftchick <Brian.Kraftchick@odfl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:25:37 -0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 May 2004 19:37:03 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thanks for the info.  The main thing with our issue though, is that we don't have any Cisco devices on our network at all.....very weird.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Hampel, Paul E [mailto:paul.hampel@eds.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:15 PM
To: 'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'
Subject: RE: [nv-l]

From what I have seen they are Cisco CDP neighbors that were discovered during a daily configuration poll. I have only seen it on some of the newer device types from Cisco.

Paul E. Hampel
paul.hampel@eds.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Brian Kraftchick
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:35 AM
To: NVList (E-mail)
Subject: [nv-l]

NV 7.1.3 on Win2K
 
Could anybody tell me where the 0.0.0.0 interfaces come from in router objects?  I have two core routers that have only ever had 1 or 2 0.0.0.0 interfaces discovered....now they both have about 50.....what could this be coming from ?
 
Brian Kraftchick
Network Administrator
Old Dominion Freight Line
Ph: (336) 822-5938
Fax: (336) 822-5149
Web Site: www.odfl.com
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web