nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] ovwdb high CPU after upgrade to 7.1.4

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] ovwdb high CPU after upgrade to 7.1.4
From: "Jorge A. Jiles" <jorge.jiles@ualberta.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:02:25 -0700
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:05:17 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <OFEC744FD4.8BE52E75-ON87256F94.007CC336-85256F94.007CE4A9@ us.ibm.com>
References: <6.1.2.0.1.20050125152126.01ea3c70@pop.srv.ualberta.ca> <OFEC744FD4.8BE52E75-ON87256F94.007CC336-85256F94.007CE4A9@us.ibm.com>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Yes, I checked that already. Bellow is the configuration of ovwdb.lrf. I'm not familiar with what is in the FFDC directory.

OVs_YES_START:nvsecd:-O,-n50000,-t:OVs_WELL_BEHAVED:15:/usr/OV/conf/FFDC/scripts/ovwdb_FFDC:5:



At 03:44 PM 1/25/2005, you wrote:

Have you checked the ovwdb cache size to make sure it is greater than the 25000 objects? The default is 5000. Change it with serversetup.

James Shanks
Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
b9df8ede.gif"Jorge A. Jiles" <jorge.jiles@ualberta.ca>

          "Jorge A. Jiles" <jorge.jiles@ualberta.ca> Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

          01/25/2005 05:33 PM
          Please respond to nv-l
b9df8f0d.gif
To
b9df8f0d.gif
nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
b9df8f0d.gif
cc
b9df8f0d.gif
b9df8f0d.gif
Subject
b9df8f0d.gif
[nv-l] ovwdb high CPU after upgrade to 7.1.4
b9df8f0d.gifb9df8f0d.gif

Netview 7.1.4
Solaris 8
Sun blade 1000 2x750 CPU
2 GB RAM
Approximately 25000 objects in the database

I just upgraded Netview from 7.1 to 7.1.4. The upgrade seemed ok, no errors
during the installations or the log files. The problem I'm having is that
now ovwdb process uses as much as 50% of CPU processing. The GUI
synchronizes constantly making the application very slow in response time.
I did the same upgrade in my test system with no problems, although it runs
a much smaller database.
I think I read somewhere a while ago about this situation, but I can not
remember what the recommended solution was. I can not find this problem in
the release notes.

If any one has any recommendation in how to solve this problem, it will be
highly appreciated.

Thanks
.

Jorge A Jiles
Network Analyst
Computing & Network Services
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada








Jorge A Jiles
Network Analyst
Computing & Network Services
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web