nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Interface down not receiving!

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Interface down not receiving!
From: "Allison, Jason \(JALLISON\)" <JALLISON@arinc.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:01:26 -0500
Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:02:23 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcUj7IhsaT7U7NlFRESOUt5igXyQSQAAqGAw
Thread-topic: [nv-l] Interface down not receiving!
I guess there is two parts, and I am not fully aware of which one you
are having problems with.

1.  Cisco devices can be configured to send alarms to a management
station when certain events occur.

2.  NetView can be configuerd so that a device is managed and polled
using some specific interval.  When NetView determines a device is not
responding, it will send a trap to itself of a device being down.

Which one are you having problems with?

Thanks,

Jason Allison
Principal Engineer
ARINC Incorporated



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
On Behalf Of Jane Curry
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:38 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Interface down not receiving!


I suppose this switch really is down?  There's no redundant routing 
around such that NetView can actually ping this switch??
The other thing to check is how frequently NetView is status polling 
this switch - use Options -> SNMP Configuration.  You can also check 
poll times using netmon -a 12 to dump the ping list to 
/usr/OV/log/netmon.trace and netmon -a 16 to dump the SNMP poll list.
Cheers, Jane

Larry Fagan wrote:

>Yes.. Jason..
>The switch is configured and that's the reason we are
>getting cold start traps and chassis alarms ..
>I'll check if i can put a sniffer on wire.. Should
>switch send down traps or should netview generate if
>it cannot ping the switch.
>Thanks,
>Larry
>--- "Allison, Jason (JALLISON)" <JALLISON@arinc.com>
>wrote:
>  
>
>>Is the switch configured to send traps to the IP
>>address of the NV
>>management station?  Can you put a sniffer on the
>>wire to verify it is
>>being sent?
>>
>>Jason Allison
>>Principal Engineer
>>ARINC Incorporated
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
>>On Behalf Of Larry Fagan
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:43 AM
>>To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
>>Subject: [nv-l] Interface down not receiving!
>>
>>
>>Hi Guys,
>>Being a newbie i have a problem as usual. We have NV
>>7.1.3 FP 3 on AIX. The issue is, i'm not getting a
>>interface down trap from one of the core switch when
>>it is down but i'm getting interface down when
>>another
>>switch from same subnet is swithed off from same
>>site.
>>All i get is some cold start trap and chassis
>>alarms.
>>The switch is in the map and SNMP connectivity is
>>fine. But we use pings for this device.
>>Any ideas why netview is not receiving interface
>>down
>>from this device only? Also is switch supposed to
>>send
>>down traps or should netview ping and generate a
>>trap
>>down event.
>>Many thanks,
>>Larry
>>
>>
>>      
>>              
>>__________________________________
>>Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
>>Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
>>http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>
>  
>

-- 
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2005 Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>.  All rights
reserved.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web