To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] PC becomes Router !! |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:25:42 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:26:10 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <42C018E9.4000905@alcatel.fr> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Yes, it is normal. It usually means the ipforwarding is enabled between the interfaces on the server. If you do not want to see it at that level of the map, your best bet is to hide it from that submap. It will still show up in the segments on which it has interfaces. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
Hi all, my Netview is 7.1.3. On my network, a PC (W2K SP4) had one network interface in 192.168.80.x/24 and all was fine (trap well received, etc ..) Then I added on this PC a second network interface in 169.254.x.x/16. After a manual polling request, the second interface was discovered, and the object was added at the network level (in root submap), linked to the 2 IP network (192.168.80.x/24 and 169.254.x.x/16) and in its properties : IPRouter, Node, Computer, Connector, Router, PC, IP. Before the add of the interface, the properties was : Node, Computer, Connector, PC, IP. Note the icone used to display the PC is still the PC icone. Is it a normal behavior, I mean when a host have 2 interfaces on 2 IP networks, it is considered as a router ? thanks for your help. -- Gildas |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] PC becomes Router !!, Gildas . Plouzennec |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Status Polling myth, Leslie Clark |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] PC becomes Router !!, Gildas . Plouzennec |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] PC becomes Router !!, George deSocio |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web