To: | <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] NLB Clusters |
From: | "Catalina Martinez" <Catalina.Martinez@tlc.state.tx.us> |
Date: | Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:51:35 -0600 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:52:13 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AcYSwpBOmXf27MPnRjiTiK+LmnMdIAADBkygAAvxrfA= |
Thread-topic: | NLB Clusters |
Greetings All, Has anyone been successful in managing Microsoft Network Load Balancing Clusters. We have a couple of variations of clusters, NLB or Active/Passive. Right Now, I want to try to get NLB clusters to work.. these are the issues that I'm running into: 1) During initial discovery, the names get associated with the wrong ip. 2) the interfaces keep flopping back and forth In our environment, we have separate subnets for each "cluster". Netview does not need to monitor if a fail over occurs, just if clients are unable to access the application. CP2KDEVIIS01 - 10.20.7.89 public CP2KDEVIIS01 - 10.20.5.11 mgnt CP2KDEVIISV1 - 10.20.7.116 virtual CP2KDEVIIS02 - 10.20.7.90 public CP2KDEVIIS02 - 10.20.5.12 mgnt Let me know your experience with MS Clusters. Catalina |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Handling PRI/BRI Links through Netview?, usman . taokeer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] NLB Clusters, Catalina Martinez |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Re: data collection target limit, Evans, Bill |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] NLB Clusters, Catalina Martinez |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web