To: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [NV-L] Demandpoll Problems |
From: | Mark Sklenarik <marksk@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:07:20 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:03:07 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <C353F42ACF29E240B9050B86F1852A4F5F46D8@nlspm204.emea.corp.eds.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Hi David, Are both machines defined correctly in "xnmsnmpconf", specifically the community string? Did you try a "mib browser" of failing device to make sure NetView is using correct community name? Select the working device, browser it, then enter the address or name of other device and attempt to browser same mib, does the browser show the correct community name being used? Also, did you check the 3550 to ensure that NetView machine is allowed to query snmp on it? It is a problem I have run into here in the lab with newly deployed devices. My network tech, is telling me that I have to provide a name/address of all machines I want to access the Cisco device, and since I am in a test lab, the number of machines that need access to Cisco devices, gets fairly long. Did you provide community string with the snmpwalk command, or let command get it from NetView? Try the snmpwalk command with a -d option and no community string, to see if command gets the correct community string from NetView. "snmpwalk -d [3550name] system" -- check output for correct community string being used. Regards Mark
Dear list, Need your advise and experience on the following problem. NV714, FP3, Solaris trying to discover Cisco 3550 switch with routing function (several VLAN configured and using community string index). The strange thing is that two switches with the same configuration, one can be discovered and the other not (even I loadhosts it manually, then demandpoll doesn't work, in the NON-snmp smartset). They are in the same subnet too (they are in the same room). Command line snmpwalk worked fine for both. Can you help? Thank you in advance. Regards, David _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] Graph historical data, Palkovics László |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [NV-L] Demandpoll Problems, Liu, David |
Previous by Thread: | [NV-L] Demandpoll Problems, Liu, David |
Next by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] Demandpoll Problems, Liu, David |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web