To: | nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [NV-L] Interface Down |
From: | Larry Fagan <larrytechie@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:08:37 -0800 (PST) |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:09:41 +0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=cVCTBUG0lWNMojNSs48DMarHdSIgS0D3xh5VdCtQaEfMDzb9EtQsdAbQcKJ4Nbdy4UIdmnFPGhYRAELzaqnZRZEPYDkEBwxlt2Ziw+xgkc3ZSBBQLLPXht/ypZDMYvquWFzPmpla30iiBmN+fDO1NGGZvxw2Jae6/SPtgvwX0m8=; |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | larrytechie@yahoo.com, Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
James, Is that by design on Netmon. Any solutions for this one? Thanks, Bill You'll only get another interface down if it goes up first and then down again. netmon does not send duplicates James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Network Availability Management Network Management - Development Tivoli Software, IBM Corp Larry Fagan <larrytechie@yaho o.com> To Sent by: nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com nv-l-bounces@list cc s.ca.ibm.com Subject [NV-L] Interface Down 12/05/2007 10:26 AM Please respond to larrytechie@yahoo .com; Please respond to Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ib m.com> Hi, I'm trying to resolve an issue with my Ops Team. We have NetView 7.1.3. One of the server went down and Interface down alert was generated and was sent to operations about three days back. Operations closed the ticket without resolving. We have bi-directional event flow from TEC to remedy. My question is, If the event was closed back in TEC, should'nt NetView generate one more interface down alert? or will NetView send down only once and will NOT send Interface down once more for the same Interface? Please help me. Thanks, Bill. Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now._______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only)
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [NV-L] Interface Down, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [NV-L] Interface Down, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] Interface Down, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
Next by Thread: | Re: [NV-L] Interface Down, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web