[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [NV-L] Interface Down

To: "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Interface Down
From: "Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\)" <dvanorder@deloitte.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 09:04:34 -0500
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:05:42 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Importance: normal
In-reply-to: <626655.7288.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
List-help: <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help>
List-id: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-post: <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Priority: normal
References: <626655.7288.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Sender: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
Thread-index: Acg3VNKFRyM4ssrFSwG6zd5t6F8nRgBhB1Ag
Thread-topic: [NV-L] Interface Down
I'm a little behind in reading the list these days. This happens to us quite a bit, and no doubt other customers as well. We have automated ticket generation with CA Service Desk. It's a mess every time it occurs, and it's a process issue. I grew weary defending NetView when it was correct 99.9% of the time, and finally wrote a post-mortem process for ops to follow to determine if the technology failed or the process broke down. It only covers the 'why'. Training and motivation are what prevent it from happening in the first place--and that's always a big challenge. Oops, guess I should have said opportunity ;-)

From: Larry Fagan [mailto:larrytechie@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 9:26 AM
To: nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com
Subject: [NV-L] Interface Down

I'm trying to resolve an issue with my Ops Team.
We have NetView 7.1.3. One of the server went down and Interface down alert was generated and was sent to operations about three days back. Operations closed the ticket without resolving. We have bi-directional event flow from TEC to remedy.
My question is, If the event was closed back in TEC, should'nt NetView generate one more interface down alert? or will NetView send down only once and will NOT send Interface down once more for the same Interface?
Please help me.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. 

Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]
NV-L mailing list
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web