| To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unofficial IP addresses |
| From: | Mark van Kerkwyk <kerkwyk@COMTECH.COM.AU> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 07:33:14 +1000 |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
| Sender: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
Unfortunately Netview's SNMP implementation doesn't support NAT.
That's my number 1 wish list item for Netview.
Mark
Ken Karasek <KGKARASE@HEWITT.COM> on 16/02/99 06:15:41
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu>
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
cc:
Subject: Re: Unofficial IP addresses
Have you thought about implementing NAT to resolve your multiple 10.x.x.x
networks?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unofficial IP addresses, Ken Karasek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: passing parameters in rulesets, erik nilsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unofficial IP addresses, Ken Karasek |
| Next by Thread: | Forcing a config poll, Lucy Premus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web