To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Unofficial IP addresses |
From: | Mark van Kerkwyk <kerkwyk@COMTECH.COM.AU> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 07:33:14 +1000 |
Reply-to: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
Sender: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
Unfortunately Netview's SNMP implementation doesn't support NAT. That's my number 1 wish list item for Netview. Mark Ken Karasek <KGKARASE@HEWITT.COM> on 16/02/99 06:15:41 Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu cc: Subject: Re: Unofficial IP addresses Have you thought about implementing NAT to resolve your multiple 10.x.x.x networks? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Unofficial IP addresses, Ken Karasek |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: passing parameters in rulesets, erik nilsson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Unofficial IP addresses, Ken Karasek |
Next by Thread: | Forcing a config poll, Lucy Premus |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web