James -
Is there a site or something where we can find out about known bugs in
NetView? Is there also a place where we can download patches?
Jennifer Redding
Andersen Consulting
phone: 413-535-4135
voice mail: 1-800-624-5780 X2384
email: jennifer.redding@ac.com
> ----------
> From: James Shanks[SMTP:James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM]
> Reply To: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> NetView
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 1999 10:17 AM
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
> Subject: Re: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?
>
> There is a recent APAR in this area (PJ26332), one that was diagnosed
> just
> this week, which says that basically, if the first variable of the
> trap is
> not an integer with a value of less than 1000, then the trap will not
> get
> passed to connected applications, of which the tecad adapter is one.
> This
> affects on NT NetView 5.1 Seems that there is an overly strict
> criteria
> here that was added to trapd to cut down on the amount of traps it was
> needlessly passing to other daemons. The problem is that it was
> designed
> by someone who thought about only NetView traps, and that's why it
> filters
> out too much.
>
> You could test whether this was your problem by using a custom trap
> you
> code yourself with snmptrap. Or you could just call Support, explain
> your
> problem, and tell them you would like to get an efix when one is
> available.
>
>
> James Shanks
> Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
>
>
>
> KG KG <kkg001@HOTMAIL.COM> on 03/17/99 11:00:32 AM
>
> Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
>
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
> cc: (bcc: James Shanks)
> Subject: Re: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?
>
>
>
>
>
> Doug,
>
>
> I am using tecad_nv6k between NV 5.1 on NT to send traps to a NT based
> tec/3.6 on another server
>
> I added enterprises to the tecad_nv6k.oid file, but the traps still
> dont
> get thri.
>
> also the tec adaptor proces gets all teh CPU. Does anyone know of a
> patch or a fix for this?
>
> i am using the tme version of tecad_nv6k. is the non_tme version any
> better?
>
> Thanks .
> KKiran
>
> >From: Doug Horn <Doug_Horn@HSBC.CA>
> >Reply-To: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
> NetView<NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu>
> >To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
> >Subject: Re: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?
> >Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:07:39 -0800
> >
> >Subject: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >I am trying to use tecad_nv6k to send netview messages to a tec
> console.
> >
> >The tec adapter is dying after some time. It doesnt seem to be
> stable.
> >Theres also an issue with the CPU it sometimes consumes
> >
> >Is there a patch for this? anyone having a problem using this in a
> >stable
> >environment?
> >
> >>What version and flavour are you using ?
> >
> >I am also trying to send custom traps (Sent by Bay and Cisco's) and
> >found out these are not sent to tec by default. I added some trap
> >definitions in tecad_nv6k.cds and .baroc files, compiled the baroc
> >file under tec.. still not getting the traps..
> >
> >does anyone have a procedure for adding custom traps?
> >
> >
> >>If the traps are comming into Netview then you must ensure >that the
> OID
> >#'s are in the teacd_nv6k.oid file. I think >of the OID file like
> the
> FMT
> >file of a logfile adapter. IF >it does not find a match it will not
> >forward. There are >some there but I have had to add to this file
> for
> >>NetFinity, APC, 3COM, etc.
> >
> >NetView documentation is very inadequate when it comes to
> >integration issues..
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Kiran,
> >
> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
|